LYING in the pigeon (SKINNER)

3 Pages • 949 Words • PDF • 242.2 KB
Uploaded at 2021-09-24 11:06

This document was submitted by our user and they confirm that they have the consent to share it. Assuming that you are writer or own the copyright of this document, report to us by using this DMCA report button.


JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR11982,

38, 201-203

NUMBER

2

(SEPTEMBER)

"LYING" IN THE PIGEON ROBERT P. LANZA, JAMES STARR, AND B. F. SKINNER UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA AND HARVARD UNIVERSITY

Two pigeons were taught to use symbols to communicate information about hidden colors to each other. When reporting red was more generously reinforced than reporting yellow or green, both birds passed through a period in which they "lied" by reporting another color as red. Key words: communication, symbolic matching, colors, "lying," pigeons

A sustained conversation in which one pigeon communicated information to another through the use of symbols has been described by Epstein, Lanza, and Skinner (1980). The pigeons pecked labeled keys on adjoining keyboards (Figure 1). The pigeon on the left (called "Jack") could obtain food only by correctly selecting the color on his keyboard that corresponded to a hidden color accessible only to the other pigeon ("Jill"). Jack "asked for

of time (approximately 3.8 sec). When the color was either green or yellow, the reinforcement was much shorter. Grain remained accessible only from the time the listener pecked THANK YOU until the corresponding color was struck. When the listener was Jack, food was accessible to Jill for an average of .72 sec for green and 1.3 sec for yellow. When the listener was Jill, the times for Jack were .75 and .74 sec, respectively. These conditions were Jill's help" by pecking and illuminating a key maintained for two to three weeks in daily marked WHAT COLOR? In response, Jill sessions of 75 complete exchanges. The speakers' responses to the R, Y, and G looked at the hidden color (either red, green, or yellow) and pecked the corresponding black keys during the last 15 sessions prior to the and white symbol key. To assure continued change and the first 15 sessions following the help, Jack depressed the key marked THANK change are shown in Figure 2. Before the YOU, rewarding Jill with brief access to mixed change, indicated by the vertical dotted lines, grain. Jack then looked at the symbol and the durations of reinforcement for all correct pecked the key bearing the corresponding responses were the same. Shortly after the color. Correct selections were automatically change, when "R" was more generously reinreinforced with food. Jack then requested the forced, both pigeons correctly reported "R" name of the next color (selected pseudo-ran- more often. Jill reached complete accuracy. domly). Here we report the effect of a change When the hidden color was green, Jack soon in the contingencies that led to behavior that called it red 60% of the time. He called yelin the human species would be called "lying." low red even more often. Jill also "lied" (but In a separate study the pigeons had been only about yellow), in spite of the precision conditioned over a period of several weeks to with which she identified red. Throughout the experiments false responses play the roles of both speaker and listener (Epstein & Skinner, 1981). The following modifi- were never reinforced and were followed by cations were then made. When the hidden the darkening of the apparatus for several color was red, a correct report was reinforced seconds. By the fifteenth day of biased reinwith access to mixed grain for the usual length forcement, the performances had essentially returned to normal. In summary, when correctly reporting a red We thank Scott Randall for helpful comments. The color was more strongly reinforced than rework was supported by NSF grant BNS-8007342. Send porting yellow or green, both pigeons passed reprint requests to B. F. Skinner, Department of Psychology and Social Relations, Harvard University, through a period in which they reported another color as red. Was this done with "intent Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138. 201

ROBERT P. LANZA et al.

202

Hidden color

WHAT COLOR ? YOU

&'a

w

0 I

Listener's keyboard

Speaker's keyboard

Fig. 1. Adjoining keyboards for the pigeons. The listener (on the left) needs information about the color recessed 5 cm behind the curtain in the upper righthand corner of the speaker's keyboard on the right. The R, G, and Y on the speaker's keyboard are black on white. The three keys below the WHAT COLOR? key on the listener's keyboard are- yellow, red, and green from left to right.

to deceive"? If intention is only an indirect way of referring to the consequences responsible for the intentional behavior, then the answer would appear to be yes. The listener, given a wrong name, was deceived in the sense of then making an ineffective response. True, it was the experimenter who intercepted the reinforcement, but it is society not an individual who "punishes lying."

REFERENCES Epstein, R., Lanza, R. P., & Skinner, B. F. Symbolic communication between two pigeons (Columba livia domestica). Science, 1980, 207, 543-545. Epstein, R., & Skinner, B. F. The spontaneous use of memoranda by pigeons. Behaviour Anaelysis Letters, 1981, 1, 241-246. Received May 18, 1982 Final acceptance May 19, 1982

"LYING" IN THE PIGEON

203 Jill

Jack

1O&-

A

80-

1

\ 60

"~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

.j Hidden color: Red

.

-. "Y9key

40o -

99 ....... keG

20 0 0

U80-

-60-

0*oHidden colorYellow

CL o20-

0.+10

_

IL

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

.

.A....

60 4100 400 °

1

0

25

3

15

20

215

30

0

5

2

5

3

110

15

20

25

30

40-

0

5

10

0

5

Sessions Fig. 2. "Lying" in the pigeons. The two columns show the speakers' responses to the R, Y, and G keys when the hidden color was red, yellow, or green. To the right of the vertical dotted lines reporting red was more generously reinforced than reporting yellow or green.
LYING in the pigeon (SKINNER)

Related documents

3 Pages • 949 Words • PDF • 242.2 KB

159 Pages • 56,555 Words • PDF • 4.6 MB

83 Pages • 24,243 Words • PDF • 916.3 KB

1 Pages • PDF • 1.6 MB

1 Pages • 360 Words • PDF • 73.3 KB

15 Pages • 3,772 Words • PDF • 217.2 KB

774 Pages • PDF • 39.4 MB

66 Pages • 1,885 Words • PDF • 6.8 MB

1 Pages • 24 Words • PDF • 83.5 KB

297 Pages • 75,906 Words • PDF • 18.2 MB

10 Pages • 6,525 Words • PDF • 224.5 KB

264 Pages • 66,783 Words • PDF • 3.5 MB